检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐寿军[1] 顾小莉[1] 田舜[1] 张宝生[1] 卜义霞[1] 许如根[1] 庄恒扬[1]
出 处:《扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版)》2007年第1期64-67,共4页Journal of Yangzhou University:Agricultural and Life Science Edition
基 金:江苏省高校自然科学基金资助项目(02KJB210006);江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室开放课题(02738800352)
摘 要:2005-2006年在扬州大学实验农场进行了发育特性明显差异的4个冬大麦品种不同播期的田间试验。通过对大麦出叶、叶龄和单株叶面积的系统观测,以生理发育时间为基础,构建了大麦叶龄和单株叶面积动态模型,并进行了检验。结果表明:不同品种和播期大麦叶热间距观测值与模拟值绝对误差为0.2~9.9℃d,根均方差(RMSE)为3.8~5.4℃d;叶龄预测绝对误差为0~1.9,RMSE为0.6~0.7;最终叶片数预测绝对误差为0.2~2.0,RMSE为0.7~1.0。不同品种在各生育时期单株叶面积观测值与模拟值绝对误差为0.72~9.09cm^2,RMSE为1.20~3.53cm^2。Through observation and analysis of field experiments with 4 winter barley cultivars and 4 .sowing dates in the Experimental Farm of Yangzhou University, Jiangsu province and based on physiological development time, the dynamic models of the leaf age and leaf area per plant in barley were developed and checked up in various cultivars and sowing dates. The results showed that the absolute prediction error ranges of phyllochron were 0. 2-9.9 ℃ d and the root mean square errors (RMSE) were 3.8-5. 4℃ d. The absolute prediction error ranges of the leaf age were 0-1.9 and the RMSEs were 0. 6-0. 7. The absolute prediction error ranges of the final leaf numbers of main stem were 0. 2-2.0 and the RMSEs were 0. 7- 1.0. The absolute prediction errors ranges of the leaf area per plant were 0. 72- 9.09 cm^2 and the RMSEs were 1.20-3.53 cm^2.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145