检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李辉[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院国际法研究中心
出 处:《环球法律评论》2007年第2期53-63,共11页Global Law Review
摘 要:欧盟转基因产品管制体制经历了15年的历史演变,其间的关注重点可归结为“转基因生物向环境的有意释放”和“转基因食品”两个方面,目前的欧盟转基因产品管制立法则以核准程序、标签和可追踪性为中心。虽然WTO专家组“中期报告”认为欧盟及其成员国对转基因产品的“事实上的禁止”没有符合《SPS协定》的有关要求,也否认了相关的多边环境协定与本案的关联性,但专家组并未对生物技术产品在总体上安全与否做出结论,也没有认定欧盟转基因产品管制体制在总体上与WTO规则相冲突。The dispute between the EU and the US on GM Agri-products was the first case deah with by the WTO mechanism on international trade of GM products. As the core of the dispute, the GM regulation regime has experienced 15 years of evolution, focusing on " deliberate release into environment" and " GM food". The contemporary GM regulation regime of EU, however, focuses on the following three issues: authorization, labeling and traceability. Although the "Interim Report" from WTO Panel confirmed that the "de facto moratorium" adopted by EC and some of its members did not comply with the SPS agreement, and disregarded the relevance between the dispute and MEAs, it did not come to a conclusion about the safety of bio-products as a whole. Moreover, the Panel did not question the legitimacy of EU' s GM regulation regime as a whole in the WTO context.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.206.240