“市场煤”、“计划电”的纵向治理与实现条件  

Vertical Governance of Marketed Coal and Planned Power and Requirement for Its Realization

作　　者：林卫斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学经济学院,北京100871

出　　处：《改革》2007年第4期25-31,共7页Reform

摘　　要：煤电定价机制的不同并不是煤电矛盾的症结所在．煤电矛盾的根源在于煤炭价格双轨制。放松电煤价格管制后．依靠一年一度的全国煤炭订货会上签订的计划电煤合同无法有效地治理煤电间的纵向关系。解决煤电矛盾的根本途径在于深化市场化改革．打破集体谈判形成重点电煤合同的纵向治理模式。在有效竞争的“市场煤”条件下．煤炭企业与电力企业将根据电煤交易特征形成交易成本最小化的治理结构，有效地协调双方的利益关系。The essential reason that leads to the conflict between coal and electricity corporations is the lateral dualtrack pricing system of coal industry, rather than the vertical dual-track pricing system of coal and electricity industries. The traditional vertical governance mode relying on Annual China National Coal-ordering Fair isn＇t able to govern the vertical relationship of coal and electricity corporations efficiently when the price regulation is loosened. To settle the conflict ultimately, what should be done is to substitute market governance for planned governance. Transaction-cost-minimizing vertical governance structure will govern the vertical relationship harmoniously.

关 键 词：市场煤 计划电 价格双轨制 纵向治理 

分 类 号：F426.21[经济管理—产业经济]