两种不同的悖论观——情境语义学解悖方案与次协调逻辑解悖方案比较研究  

Two Different Concepts of the Liar Paradox:A Comparative Study of the Situational Semantic Solution and Paraconsistent Logical Solution

作　　者：王建芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学哲学系,北京102249

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2007年第2期38-42,共5页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(06BZX051);中国政法大学人文社会科学研究项目(020397)

摘　　要：情境语义学解悖方案与次协调逻辑解悖方案反映了两种不同的悖论观,二者在以下四个方面存在重大差异:(1)对悖论中所包含的矛盾认识不同;(2)解悖思路不同;(3)对悖论产生根源问题认识不同;(4)解悖结果不同。The situational semantic solution and paraconsistent logical solution to the liar paradox actually reflect two different concepts of the liar paradox. Their differences are found in the following four aspects： a. different viewpoints on the contradiction contained in the liar paradox; b. different solutions to the liar paradox ; c. different viewpoints of the cause of the liar paradox ; （4） different results of these two solutions. In the comparative study, the paper also analyzes the relationship between true contradiction, logical contradiction and dialectical contradiction, the cause of the liar paradox and so on.

关 键 词：情境语义学解悖方案 次协调逻辑解悖方案 说谎者悖论 

分 类 号：B815[哲学宗教—逻辑学]