社会交往焦虑量表和社交恐惧量表的修订  

Revision of Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and Social Phobia Scale

作　　者：叶冬梅[1] 钱铭怡[1] 刘兴华[2] 陈曦[3] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学心理学系 [2]首都师范大学心理学系 [3]美国乔治亚大学

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2007年第2期115-117,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助(项目号:30370483)

摘　　要：目的:翻译并修订社会交往焦虑量表(SIAS)和社交恐惧量表(SPS),并考察其心理测量学特征。方法:对1300多名北京市大学生进行测查,对量表进行验证性因素分析和信效度检验,建立北京市大学生常模。结果:验证性因素分析的结果显示,SIAS和SPS的单因素结构拟合较好。SIAS的内部一致性信度为0.874,分半信度为0.862,重测信度为0.863;SPS量表的内部一致性信度为0.904,分半信度为0.865,重测信度为0.849。以被试在负性评价恐惧量表上的得分为效标,SIAS和SPS量表的效标效度分别为0.514和0.479。结论:SIAS和SPS符合心理测量学的要求,可作为我国对社交焦虑的测量工具。Objective： To revise the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale （SIAS） and Social Phobia Scale （SPS）, which are self-related social anxiety measurements developed by Mattick and his colleagues. Methods： Data were collected from a sample of more than 1,300 college students of Beijing and analyzed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis, reliability test and validity test. Results： The results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the revised SIAS and SPS were single-factor construct and had good construct validities. The Cronbach＇s α coefficient of the SIAS scale was 0.874, the reliability coefficient of split-half was 0.862, and the test-retest stability coefficient was 0.863. The Cmnbach＇s α coefficient of the SPS scale was 0.904, the reliability coefficient of split-half was 0.865, and the test-retest stability coefficient was 0.849. The correlation between total score of SIAS and that of Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale （FNE） was 0.514, and the correlation between total score of SPS and that of FNE was 0.479. Conclusion： The revised scales of SIAS and SPS has good psychometric quality and can be used in Chinese college students.

关 键 词：社会交往焦虑量表 社交恐惧量表 信度 效度 

分 类 号：G449.1[哲学宗教—心理学]