《物种起源》的论证结构  

Argument Structure in Origin of Species

作　　者：李敏霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东商学院华商学院,广东广州511300

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2007年第4期31-34,63,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"当代生命科学哲学发展趋势研究"(项目批准号:06CZX012)和"进化生物学前沿几个重大哲学问题"(批准号:05BZX030)

摘　　要：20世纪60年代到80年代中期,学界多是事先假定达尔文遵循着某种单一的科学方法,相信《物种起源》有单一的论证结构;80年代中期开始,一些学者放弃了寻找《物种起源》中某种单一论证结构的努力,相信达尔文在《物种起源》中采用了多种论证策略。根据不同的理论有不同的理论成功标准,自然选择理论是由多个理论构成的,这就决定了《物种起源》中不可能存在单一的论证逻辑。From the early 1960s to the mid 1980s, most scholars supposed Darwin followed some types of single method of science, they believed there was a unify argument structure in the Origin of Species. But some scholars began to give up this attempt after the mid 1980s. They admitted the argument structure in the Origin of Species was not single but pluralism. Darwin＇s theory was composed of sets of doctrines. Different doctrines have different successful criterions of theories. It decided that there was no possibility of a unified logical argument in his theory. So one way what Darwin could do was to invoke different argument strategies for different theories.

关 键 词：达尔文 《物种起源》 论证结构 

分 类 号：N03[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]