PubMed和中国期刊全文数据库护理理论研究文献比较与启示  

Comparative Study on the Literatures of Nursing Theory on PubMed Databank and CJFD

作　　者：王维利[1] 陈晓环[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽医科大学护理学院,安徽合肥230032

出　　处：《护理学报》2007年第2期1-4,共4页Journal of Nursing（China）

基　　金：安徽省高校省级教学研究项目基金资助(2007jyxm248)

摘　　要：目的为我国护理理论的教学、应用及创新研究提供依据。方法对1997-2006年期间,在篇名中以理论和护理为检索词,检索PubMed数据库和中国期刊全文数据库的护理理论专题研究文献,并进行比较研究。结果共检出704篇,PubMed文献353篇,中国期刊全文数据库文献351篇。从文献数量上看,前5年中国期刊全文数据库文献是81(占23.08%)篇,低于PubMed文献(183篇,51.84%);后5年中国期刊全文数据库文献是270(76.92%)篇,高于PubMed文献(170篇,48.16%)。从文献类别上比较:中国期刊全文数据库文献的种类比较单一,一般护理理论应用体会性文献为303篇(占86.32%),而PubMed文献的种类比较丰富,其中综述、案例报道、评论、随机对照、编者撰文、传记研究等各种文献总计201篇(占56.94%)。结论我国护理理论研究目前仍处在起步阶段,国外一些护理理论的研究方法值得借鉴。Objective To build a theoretical basis for teaching, application and innovation of nursing theory in China. Methods Literature retrievals with the words of nursing and theory as retrieval field on PubMed and CJFD was conducted during 1997 and 2006 and the retrieved papers on nursing theory were compared. Results 704 papers on PubMed and CJFD were retrieved out. For the first five years, 81 papers on nursing theory were embodied on CJFD （taking up 23.08%）, but 183 on PubMed （51.84%）. For the second five years, the numbers were 270（76.92%） and 170 （48.16%）, respectively. In category, the papers on CJFD were single： General application of nursing theory accounted for 303 papers （86.32%）, but those on PuhMed were rich in review, case report, comment, randomized control study, editorial and bibliography, accounting for 201 （56.94%）. Conclusion The study on nursing theory in China is at its preliminary stage, so we need to learn from foreign research in methodology.

关 键 词：文献研究 护理理论 PUBMED 中国期刊全文数据库 比较研究 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]