检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛同春[1] 陈荣新[1] 叶胜龙[1] 孙瑞霞[1] 陈洁[1] 汤钊猷[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学中山医院肝癌研究所、癌变与侵袭原理教育部重点实验室,上海200032
出 处:《中华肝脏病杂志》2007年第4期261-265,共5页Chinese Journal of Hepatology
基 金:国家重点基础研究项目(2004CB518708);复旦大学“211”工程肿瘤学科建设项目(校批字[2003]257号)
摘 要:目的对比观察不同转移潜能人肝癌细胞株趋化因子受体谱差异性表达。方法Pre- mier软件设计18对趋化因子受体引物,RT-PCR分析SMMC-7721、MHCC97-L、MHCC97-H和HCCLM6细胞侵袭转移潜能逐渐增强的人肝癌细胞株趋化因子受体谱。结果4组不同转移潜能细胞株趋化因子受体表达谱存在明显差异(P<0.01),其中CCR10、CXCR4、CXCR6表达随转移潜能增加逐渐降低。HCCLM6表达谱中CCR3、CCR4、CCR10、CCR12及XCR1比SMMC-7721表达明显降低甚至缺失(P<0.01),而CXCR1(P=0.006)、CXCR5(P=0.003)表达高于低转移潜能组SMMC-7721。MHCC97-H和MHCC97-L比较,除CXCR2、CXCR6、XCR1外差异均有统计学意义,其中CCR1(P=0.002)、CCR2(P=0.004)、CCR5(P=0.046)表达高于MHCC97- L。CXCR4在模板减量时只能在SMMC-7721组检测到。结论高低转移潜能肝癌细胞株趋化因子受体表达在mRNA水平存在差异性表达,与肝癌细胞株差异性转移潜能相关。Objective To compare different expression profiles of all known chemokine receptors in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines with different metastasis potentials. Methods Eighteen pairs of chemokine receptor primers were designed using Premier software. Expression profiles of the 18 chemokine receptors on four HCC cell lines of lower to higher potentials of metastasis (SMMC-7721, MHCC97- L, MHCC97-H and HCCLM6) were analyzed by RT-PCR. Expression of CXCR4 was detected by RT-PCR. Results Expression profiles of chemokine receptors on four HCC cell lines with different metastatic potentials had significant differences (P 〈 0.01), in which CCR 10, CXCR4 and CXCR6 expressions decreased gradually as the metastatic potential of the cell lines increased. The expressions of CCR3, CCR4, CCR10, CCR12 and XCR1 on HCCLM6 were significantly reduced compared with SMMC-7721 (P 〈 0.01), whereas the expressions of CXCR1 (P = 0.006) and CXCR5 (P = 0.003) exceeded that of SMMC-7721. Except for CXCR2, CXCR6 and XCR1, most of chemokine receptors on MHCC97-H were expressed differently com- pared with MHCC97-L (P 〈 0.05), in which expressions ofCCR1 (P = 0.002), CCR2 (P = 0.004) and CCR5 (P = 0.046) exceeded MHCC97-L. CXCR4 was detected only on the positive controls and SMMC-7721 when the template of total RNA was reduced one-half in RT-PCR. Conclusion Chemokine receptors are expressed very differently at mRNA level on HCC cell lines with different metastatic potentials. The different profiles of chemokine receptors in tumor microenvironment and the function of CXCR4 in HCC should be further studied. Our findings have important implications in understanding the relationship between chemokine receptors and the metastatic potential of HCC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.148