从科学自然观的形成,看中西方身体训练的差异  

On the Differences of Chinese and Western Physical Training from the Angle of the Formation of Scientific Natural Value

作　　者：吕韶钧[1] 竺玉明[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京体育大学,北京100084

出　　处：《北京体育大学学报》2007年第4期552-554,共3页Journal of Beijing Sport University

摘　　要：以中西方身体训练的理论体系作为研究对象,采用文献资料研究法、类比推论、归纳与演绎,以及逻辑分析法等科研方法,从中西方自然观和身体观的比较入手,探讨建立在东方“元气论”和西方“原子论”基础上的身体训练理论的差异,从而客观评价中国传统身体训练的理论体系,并为系统整理中国传统身体训练理论奠定基础。研究认为,中西方针对“身体”这样一个训练主体,建立了两种身体训练的理论模式,即:中国传统“天人合一”的身体训练理论模式和西方的“天人对立”的身体训练理论模式。从而在方法论上使得中国传统身体训练有了整体观的价值取向,而西方身体训练则走向了还原论的发展轨道上。中国传统身体训练有其自身完整的理论体系和实践方法,我们必须要采用整体的观点、平衡的观点、联系的观点和动态的观点来认识身体训练的全过程,从而建立起一套独具中国特色的身体训练新模式。With the methods of documentary review, analogism, induction, deduction and logical analysis, the theoretical system of Chinese and western physical training is taken as research objects. With the comparison between Chinese and western nature value and physical value, the differences of physical training theories respectively based on eastern Yuanqi theory and western nuclear theory are researched, in order to objectively evaluate Chinese traditional theoretical system of physical training and establish two kinds of theoretical mode of physical training, which are Chinese traditional mode of physical trainlng--the Union of Nature and People and western mode of physical training--the Opposition between Nature and People. Therefore, the value orientation of Chinese traditional physical training comes into being while western physical training goes to the road of reductionism. There is an integrative theoretical system and praoticing ways in Chinese traditional physical training, so we must use integrative, balancing, associational and dynamic ideas to observe the process of physical training, in order to establish a new mode of physical training with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：中西方 自然观 身体观 传统身体训练 

分 类 号：G808.1[文化科学—体育训练]