检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王春景[1] 杨海军[2] 刘国经 何松云 周守标[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽师范大学生命科学学院,安徽芜湖241000 [2]东北师范大学草地研究所,吉林长春130024 [3]深圳市西丽水库管理处,广东深圳518055
出 处:《植物资源与环境学报》2007年第1期40-44,共5页Journal of Plant Resources and Environment
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(30370280);深圳市水务局西丽水库生态河道试验基金项目(143-130411);安徽省重要生物资源保护与利用重点实验室专项基金项目
摘 要:研究了菰〔Zizania latifolia(Griseb.)Stapf〕、菖蒲(Acorus calamusL.)及它们的复合体系对富营养化水体的净化效果。结果表明,菰和菖蒲在供试富营养化水体中均能正常生长,二者单独种植体系或等量混合种植体系对富营养化水体均有一定的净化能力。单独种植的菰和菖蒲及二者的混合种植体系对供试水体中总氮的去除率分别为92.8%、92.7%和94.9%;对氨氮的去除率分别为95.5%、97.4%和96.6%;对总磷的去除率分别为83.9%、94.3%和84.7%;对CODCr的去除率分别为83.0%、85.5%和86.7%。单独种植的菖蒲对总磷的去除效果明显好于单独种植的菰和二者的混合种植体系。菰和菖蒲的混合种植体系对富营养化水体的净化效果与单独种植体系无明显差异。The purification efficiencies of Zizania latifolia (Griseb.) Stapf, Acorus calamus L. and their complex system to eutrophic water were studied. The results showed that both Z. latifolia and A. calamus could grow well in eutrophic water. The removal rate of TN by monoculture and complex system of Z. latifolia and A. calamus was 92.8%, 92.7% and 94.9% respectively, and that of NH3-N, TP, CODCr was 95.5% ,97.4% ,96.6% and 83.9% ,94.3% ,84.7% and 83.0% ,85.5% ,86.7% respectively. The monoculture system of A. calamus had greater effects on purifying TP than monoculture system of Z. latifolia and the two species complex system. There was no evident difference of purification efficiency to eutrophic water between complex system of the two species and monoculture system.
分 类 号:Q948.116[生物学—植物学] X52[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117