检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志(下旬版)》2007年第5期4-5,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基 金:2004年湛江市科技局立项课题(200408510)
摘 要:目的探讨虹吸法在抢救休克患者快速建立有效静脉通道中的应用效果。方法将136例休克患者随机分为虹吸法组71例和传统法组65例,虹吸法组采用虹吸负压输液法进行静脉穿刺,而传统法组采用传统输液法进行静脉穿刺,2组患者在抢救时均选择手背静脉作为穿刺部位,以第1次穿刺即见回血判定为穿刺成功。比较2组患者的穿刺成功率。结果虹吸法组穿刺成功率为64.79%,而传统法组穿刺成功率为32.31%,2组比较,X^2=14.32,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论虹吸法可明显地提高休克患者静脉穿刺的成功率,为抢救休克患者快速建立有效静脉通道开拓了一种新途径,对挽救患者生命具有非常重要的现实意义。Objective In order to study the clinical effects of using siphonage to rescue shock patients by establishing effective vein path rapidly. Methods Divided 136 shock patients into the siphonage group(71 cases) and the traditional group(65 cases) randomly, siphon negative pressure transfusion method and the traditional transfusion method were used in the two groups respectively. Compared the first successful rate between the two groups. Results The first successful rate in the siphonage group and the traditional group were 64.79% and 32.31% respectively, the difference between them was signiticant,P〈0.01. Conclusions Siphonage can effective improve the successful rate of transfusion for shock patients, and then rescue their lives.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28