检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:万启军[1] 何永成[1] 栾韶东[1] 贺争鸣[1] 陈洪滔[1] 朱丹[1] 唐娣[1] 许慧丽[1]
出 处:《临床荟萃》2007年第10期700-701,共2页Clinical Focus
摘 要:目的探讨简化的尿素动力模型评价持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)充分性的可行性。方法共观察60例行CAPD治疗半年以上的患者,分别计算每天4次交换液体所得的尿素清除指数(KT/V),并分别与1天总的KT/V值进行比较。结果每天第1次交换液体所得的KT/V值与1天总的KT/V值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但两者相关性极好(r=0.9516)。结论每天第1次透析所得的KT/V值可以代替1天总的KT/V值以评价CAPD的充分性。Objective To investigate the application of the abbreviated urea kinetic modeling in the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Methods Sixty patients on CAPD more than half one year were selected,the KT/V of each exchange was calculated and compared with the total KT/V of a day, respectively. Results There was no significant difference( P 〉0. 05) between the KT/V value obtained from the first exchange and the total KT/V value of a day,but they had good correlation( r =0. 9516). Conclusion The KT/V value obtained from the first exchange could replace the total KT/V value of a day to be used to assess the adequacy of CAPD patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.30.59