论近年来我国文学史研究中的重逻辑倾向  

On Logic-Orientation in Research of Literary History in Recent Years in China

作　　者：温潘亚[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学中文系博士后流动站

出　　处：《江海学刊》2007年第3期194-198,共5页Jianghai Academic Journal

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金项目(项目号:20060400924)与江苏省重点建设学科--"比较文学与世界文学"科研基金项目的中间成果

摘　　要：文学史的著述形态和语式主要有三种:重历史;重逻辑;历史与逻辑的统一。近年来,重逻辑形态渐成我国当前文学史研究的主流,甚至有过于主观化的倾向。其形成原因主要有三点:一是新历史主义历史观的影响;二是我国学术界对百年文学史进程反思的矫枉过正;三是当前我国学术界存在的浮躁和世俗化的氛围。其实,任何对文学史“重写”、“重构”等的努力都不能无视文学史的“史”的特性,因为文学是历史的一部分,文学史是一门科学。文学史研究要走出主观性的迷雾,关键是坚持对文学史原生态的把握与追求,吸收重历史学派的合理内核,追求历史与逻辑的统一。There are mainly three formations and styles in literary history: history-orientation, logic-orientation, and integration of history and logic. In recent years, the logic-orientation has gradually become the main stream in the research of literary history in China, and even excessively subjective. The causes are as follows: first, the effect of the view of history of the new historicism; second, the excessive reflection of the literary history over a hundred years; third, the sophisticated and restless atmosphere in Chinese academic field. However, the characteristic of the “history” should not be neglected in pursuing rewriting or reconstructing literary history, because literature is part of the history and also literary history is a science. The key to avoiding subjectivity in the literary history research lies in sticking to mastering the origin of literary history, absorbing the reasonable core of history-orientation and pursuing the integration of history and logic.

关 键 词：文学史研究 重历史 重逻辑 历史与逻辑的统一 原生态把握与追求 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]