检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡志斌[1] 何兴元[1] 李月辉[1] 朱教君[1] 李小玉[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳110016
出 处:《生态学杂志》2007年第5期700-705,共6页Chinese Journal of Ecology
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展规划资助项目(2002CB111506)
摘 要:综合利用多种数据源,结合3S技术,分析了岷江上游1986、1995和2000年3个时期的景观格局,重点探讨了森林、草地等主要景观类型在持续人类活动强度作用下的变化,确定了不同景观类型对人类活动强度的敏感程度。结果表明:1)岷江上游景观以草地、森林为主要景观类型。1986、1995和2000年3个时期森林、草地景观类型面积之和均高达96.1%、96.38%和95.23%,其它景观类型作为斑块镶嵌其中,森林和草地共同控制了整个研究区景观格局变化与生态过程;2)不同景观对人类活动强度的敏感性有显著差异。低强度的人类活动有利于有林地景观的恢复;高盖度草地对人类活动很敏感,严格减少干扰活动强度才有利于维持其景观;中盖度草地对中低强度的人类活动(如放牧)很敏感,景观退化,面积减少。By using multiple data resources and 3 S techniques, this paper analyzed the landscape patterns of Minjiang River upper reach in 1986, 1995 and 2000, with the focus on the responses of main landscape types to the anthropogenic activities. The results showed that in the study area, grassland and forestland were the main landscape types, occupying 96. 1% , 96.38% and 95.23% of the total in 1986, 1995 and 2000, respectively, and other landscape types were scattered in them. These two landscape types controlled the landscape pattern change and ecological processes of the whole study area. Different landscape types had great differences in their responses to anthropogenic activities intensity (AHI). Low AHI was beneficial to the landscape restoration of forestland; high coverage grassland was sensitive to all grades AHI except grade 1, and only strictly decreasing AHI could maintain its landscape; while medium coverage grassland was sensitive to lower and medium AHI, with the landscape degraded and the area decreased. High intensity management activities could change the landscape patterns to a desirable direction.
关 键 词:景观格局 人类活动强度 干扰 模糊逻辑 岷江上游
分 类 号:P901[天文地球—自然地理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4