甲骨文分期断代的标准问题——与林沄先生商榷  

On the Standard of Periodization of Oracle Bone Inscriptions-A discussion with Mr. Linyun

作　　者：谢济[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院历史研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《殷都学刊》2007年第1期33-35,共3页Yindu Journal

摘　　要：林沄先生以字体为标准,指出《甲骨文合集》第四期卜旬辞一部分应上移到第三期,以消除卜旬辞分期的奇特现象。其实,《合集》没有错误。林先生说字体是甲骨文断代的唯一标准,是片面的;董作宾先生的十项标准在实践中行之有效。Mr. Linyun uses style of handwriting as a standard and he points out that the fourth part buxinci in Compilation of Oracle Bone Inscriptions should be moved to the third part, simply to possibly avoid the periodization of buxunci. In fact, there is nothing wrong with Compilation of Oracle Bone Inscriptions. Mr. Lin＇s viewpoint is one - sided and Mr. Dong Zuobin＇s 10 criteria are more effective in practice.

关 键 词：甲骨文 分期断代 标准 卜旬辞 

分 类 号：K877.1[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]