论抽象行政不作为及其救济  

Research on Abstract Administrative Omission

作　　者：韩凤然[1] 李建波[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北政法职业学院,河北石家庄050061

出　　处：《河北法学》2007年第7期63-65,70,共4页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：抽象行政不作为主要存在于行政立法领域,是行政主体因怠于行使行政立法权而导致的违法行政行为,其存在必然会使公共利益和个人利益受到损害,因此,有必要建立相应的监督和救济机制,以督促行政主体履行作为的义务,进而填补法律的空白,完善我国的法律体系。相对人可以通过行政救济、司法救济和立法救济维护自己的合法权益。有权机关可以责令抽象行政不作为主体承担相应的法律责任,如责令其履行制定、修改或废止行政规范性文件的义务,确认其抽象行政不作为违法,对行政相对人进行赔偿等。administrative omission which exiting in the field of administrative legislation is illegal administrative actions led by subjects of administration who indolently invoking administration legislation power. The exiting of administrative omission prejudice inevitably public and individual interests. So to build consequential supervisory remedy mechanism in order to supervise the obligations arising from performing acting which from subjects of administration is very necessary. Furthermore, it also can stuff blanks of laws and perfect legal system. Counterparts can maintain themselves legal rights and interests through administrative remedy, judicial remedy and legislative remedy. Entitled organizations can instruct subject of abstract administrative omission to assume correspondent responsibility, such as instruct to perform the obligations of formulating, altering, abolishing documents of administrative norms, affirming the invalidity of abstract administrative omission compensating administrative counterparts etc.

关 键 词：行政不作为 抽象行政不作为 救济机制 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]