双务合同履行中的抗辩权比较分析  

Rights to Counterpleas in Contract Performance

作　　者：邱业伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆邮电大学,重庆400065

出　　处：《河北法学》2007年第7期114-118,123,共6页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国合同法》第66条、第67条、第68条、第69条规定了双务合同履行的同时履行抗辩权、先履行抗辩权和不安抗辩权。在立法上解决了守约方履行合同义务可能造成无法补救的损失,不履行合同义务又要承担违约责任的矛盾,是我国合同立法的重大进步。对同时履行抗辩权、先履行抗辩权和不安抗辩权进行比较分析,具有积极的理论和现实意义。Chinese Contract Law incorporates the rights to simultaneous performance counterplea, first-perform counterplea and uneasy counterplca respectively in its article 66, 67, 68 and 69, thus the difficult situation of non-breacher to the contract has been overcome in which non-remediable damage will be caused to him if he performs his duty or he will be liable for the breach of contract if he doesn＇t perform his duty. Aims to provide a comparison between simultaneous performance counterplea, first-perform counterplea and uneasy counterplea.

关 键 词：双务合同 抗辩权 共同 区别 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]