试论物权公示原则在物权性质界定与类别划分中的意义——兼评公示要件主义与对抗主义的立法模式选择  

On the Value of the Principle of Real Right Publication in Deciding the Nature and Dividing the Category of Real Right——Review the Legislation Mode Choice of Essentials Doctrine and Counter Doctrine

作　　者：刘保玉[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《政法论丛》2007年第3期5-12,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：司法部研究项目--"物权立法疑难问题研究"(项目编号03SFB3010)

摘　　要：物权公示原则不唯是关于物权变动的基本规则,其在物权的性质界定和类别划分中亦具有重要意义。公示要件主义意义上的物权公示原则与关于物权性质的物权绝对原则、关于物权种类的物权法定原则具有内在和谐性和逻辑上的一致性,而意思主义和公示对抗主义模式下的物权公示原则与物权法上的其他制度则存在难以自圆其说的逻辑矛盾,将会出现物权分为“有对抗力的物权”和“无对抗力的物权”之窘境。我国立法上应以公示要件主义为基础而设计物权变动的规范模式,公示对抗主义只宜在极个别的场合下适用。我国《物权法》中采行公示要件主义与公示对抗主义“并重”模式的做法,其妥当性值得推敲和检讨。The principle of the publication of real fight is not only the basic rule regulating the transference of property, it is also important in deciding the nature and dividing the category of real right. The principle of the publication in the background of essentials doctrine keeps coordination with the principle of the absoluteness of real right about the nature of real right and the principle of real right legal doctrine about the category of real fight in inherent logic. There is much logical contradication which can not be overcome between the principle of the publication in the background of the meaning doctrine and the counter doctrine and other regulations in the real right law. Chinese real right law ought to design the regulative mode about transference of property on the base of essentials doctrine and the relevant rules in the draft of real fight law should be adjusted accordingly.

关 键 词：物权 物权公示 公示要件主义 公示对抗主义 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]