检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学自动化系国家CIMS工程技术研究中心,北京100084 [2]北京理工大学机械与车辆工程学院,北京100081
出 处:《计算机集成制造系统》2007年第5期911-917,939,共8页Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基 金:国家863/CIMS主题资助项目(2004AA414020)~~~
摘 要:通过本体关联方法和层次的分析,提出了本体映射、本体结盟和本体合并3种本体集成分类方法。建立了本体集成方法的评价指标体系,包括方法的语义强度、信息的丰富性、集成层次的深入性和方法的适应性4个方面,并在评价指标的基础上,对文法层,Chimaera,PROMPT,FCA-Merge和IF-Map等5种典型的本体集成方法进行了评价,对比分析了它们的优缺点,并以此为基础指出了本体集成方法的发展趋势。By analyzing ontology association and hierarchy, the ontology integration method was proposed which was classified as; ontology mapping, ontology alignment and ontology merging. And the evaluation criteria were put forward. Contents of evaluation criteria included the semantic intensity of the integration method, the richness of information employed, the depth of ontology components which would be integrated, and the adaptability of ontology integration method. Furthermore, based on these criteria, five typical ontology integration methodologies were analyzed and compared, including syntactic-level method, Chimaera, PROMPT, FCA-Merge and IF-Map. Their advantages and disadvantages were also pointed out. Finally, the development trends of ontology integration method were described.
关 键 词:本体集成 本体映射 本体结盟 本体合并 评价指标
分 类 号:TP319[自动化与计算机技术—计算机软件与理论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145