检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省胸科医院,郑州市450008
出 处:《医药论坛杂志》2007年第8期10-11,共2页Journal of Medical Forum
摘 要:目的对比研究心电图(ECG)、超声心动图(UCG)、冠状动脉造影(CAG)对心肌梗死(MI)的诊断价值。方法对疑诊86例心肌梗死患者进行ECG、UCG、CAG检查比较。结果以CAG结果为标准,在86例疑诊心肌梗死患者中ECG异常者占62.8%,诊断率为79.4%。UCG异常者占60.5%,诊断率为76.5%。CAG异常者占81.4%(确诊MI患者68例)。结论研究证实ECG、UCG、CAG对MI均具有较高的诊断率,且各有特点,对诊断各具有互补性。Objective To contrast diagnostic value of electrocardiogram (ECG), ultrasound cardiogram (UCG) and coronary arterigraphy (CAG) about diagnostic myocardiac infarction ( MI ). Methods To contrast results of ECG, UCG and CAG about 86 doubt MI cases. Results According to a diagnostic standard of CAG of 86 doubt MI cases, abnormal ECG was 62.8%, diagnostic rates was 79.4% ;abnormal UCG was 60.5% ,diagnostic rate was 76.5% ; abnormal CAG was 81.4% ( MI cases was 68). Conclusion To MI,diagnostic rate of ECG,UCG and CAG had a high level,a special characteristics respectively and complementarity.
分 类 号:R540.45[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.14