3种包装材料的灭菌效果及成本效益研究  

Cost-benefit Analysis of Three Kinds of Packing Materials

作　　者：王洪梅[1] 杜丽萍[1] 林萍[1] 苏涛[1] 彭华[1] 

机构地区：[1]青岛大学医学院附属医院,山东青岛266003

出　　处：《中华医院感染学杂志》2007年第6期718-719,共2页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology

摘　　要：目的探讨不同包装材料的灭菌、阻菌效果及成本构成。方法将棉布类、纸塑包装、医用皱纹纸类包装随机分为3组,研究其灭菌、阻菌效果及成本构成。结果纸塑包装、医用皱纹纸类包装的灭菌及阻菌效果均优于棉布类包装;与棉布类包装相比较,纸塑包装成本降低27%,皱纹纸包装成本降低50%。结论纸塑包装和医用皱纹纸包装具有良好的灭菌和阻菌效果,其包装成本明显低于棉布类包装,值得推广应用。OBJECTIVE To appraise the bacteriostatic and blocking effect and cost construction of different kinds of materials. METHODS To divide all items into three parts at random： cotton fabric, paper-plastic package, and medical grade wrinkle paper and to study the bacteriostatic and blocking effect and cost construction of them. RESULTS Paper-plastic package and medical grade wrinkle paper had better bacteriostatic and blocking properties than cotton fabric. Comparing with cotton fabric, paper-plastic package and medical grade wrinkle paper could reduce the cost separately by 27% and 50%;the cost of wrinkle paper was lower than paper-plastic package by 32%. CONCLUSIONS Paper-plastic package and wrinkle paper have better effect on blocking bacteria and less cost than cotton fabric,which deserve more extensive application in clinic.

关 键 词：棉布 纸塑包装袋 医用皱纹纸 灭菌 阻菌 效果 成本效益 

分 类 号：R187[医药卫生—流行病学]