检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]威海市文登中心医院,山东文登264400 [2]文登市宋村中心卫生院,山东文登264423
出 处:《中国烧伤创疡杂志》2007年第2期151-154,共4页The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
摘 要:目的:探讨MEBO治疗婴儿间擦疹及臀部红斑的临床疗效,总结临床治疗经验。方法:将2000年1月~2006年9月,接诊治疗的婴儿间擦疹60例及臀部红斑260例分别随机分成治疗组和对照组,治疗组使用MEBO治疗,对照组使用氧化锌软膏治疗,评价两种疗法对间擦疹与臀部红斑的临床疗效和安全性。结果:间擦疹:治疗组的平均疗程为5.24±2.77天,对照组为8.76±2.43天,P<0.001,具有非常显著性差异,治疗组的于治疗后第3天、7天、10天的有效率均明显高于对照组;臀部红斑:治疗组的平均疗程为4.47±2.49天,对照组为8.34±2.98天,P<0.001,也具有非常显著性差异,治疗组治疗后第3天、7天、10天的有效率均明显高于对照组。结论:MEBO对间擦疹及臀部红斑疗效显著,优于常规治疗方法。Objective: To investigate the efficacy of MEBO in treating infantile intertrigo and erythema in haunch and to sum up clinical experience. Method: 60 cases of infantile intertrigo and 260 cases of erythema in haunch were divided into 2 groups and were treated respectively with MEBO and Zinc Oxide Ointment. The efficacy and the safety of the drugs were assessed. Result: For treating intertrigo, the average treatment course of MEBO was 5.24 ± 2. 77 days, and the average treatment course of Zinc Oxide Ointment was 8. 76 ± 2. 43 days. The difference between the 2 groups was very significant ( P 〈0. 01 ). The effective rates after 3, 7 and 10 days of MEBO treatment were respectively higher than that of Zinc Oxide Ointment treatment. For treating erythema, the average treatment course of MEBO was 4. 47 ± 2. 49 days, and the average treatment course of Zinc Oxide Ointment was 8. 34 ± 2. 98 days. The difference between the 2 groups was very significant ( P 〈0.01). The effective rates after 3, 7 and 10 days of MEBO treatment were respectively higher than that of Zinc Oxide Ointment treatment. Conclusion: MEBO is superior to Zinc Oxide Ointment in treating infantile intertrigo and erythema in haunch.
关 键 词:间擦疹 臀部红斑 MEBO 氧化锌软膏 疗效比较
分 类 号:R758.2[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15