检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨红梅[1] 王庆胜[1] 柳东田[1] 卞秋武[1] 王晓亮[1]
机构地区:[1]秦皇岛市第一医院心内科,河北秦皇岛066000
出 处:《心脏杂志》2007年第3期339-341,共3页Chinese Heart Journal
摘 要:目的评价血管缝合器(Perclose和Angioseal)在冠状动脉造影(CAG)或经皮冠状动脉内介入术(PCI)后股动脉止血的临床应用价值。方法选择2004年12月至2005年12月在我院行CAG或PCI术的患者180例,分为A、B、C3组,每组60例。A组使用Perclose封闭股动脉穿刺点,B组使用Angioseal封闭股动脉穿刺点,C组使用常规人工压迫方法止血。观察止血时间、制动时间、及术后并发症的发生情况。结果使用Perclose和Angioseal的止血时间和下肢制动时间均较手法压迫止血显著缩短(均P<0.01),其中使用Angioseal的止血时间还要略少于使用Perclose的止血时间,且操作更简单,但二者在止血时间和制动时间方面无统计学差异。3组在术后并发症方面无统计学差异。结论Perclose和Angioseal较常规压迫止血显著缩短止血时间和患者卧床时间。AIM To evaluate clinical value of vessel suture devices -Perelose and Angioseal - to hemostasis after coronary arteriongraphy (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS One hundred and eighty patients who underwent CAG or PCI from December 2004 to December 2005 were included in the study, of whom, 60 patients were treated with Perclose, 60 with Angioseal and 60 with artificial compression of hemostasis. The hemostasia time, immobilization time and postoperative complications of the three groups were compared. RESULTS Hemostasia time and lower limb immobilization time of hemostasis for patients treated with Perclose and Angioseal were significantly decreased compared with those treated with artificial compression ( P 〈 0.01 ). There was no obvious difference in the hemostasia time, immobilization time and postoperative complications between the Perclose group and Angioseal group, but the hemostasia time in Angioseal group was shorter than that in Perclose group. CONCLUSION Perclose and Angioseal significantly decrease the hemostasia time and lower limb immobilization time of hemostasis compared with artificial compression.
关 键 词:血管缝合器 PERCLOSE ANGIOSEAL 冠状动脉造影 经皮冠状动脉内介入术
分 类 号:R541.1[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13