机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学北京协和医院感染科,北京100730
出 处:《中国实用内科杂志》2007年第11期847-850,共4页Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine
基 金:卫生部艾滋病防治应用性研究(2003-05);首都医学发展科研基金(2003-1006);卫生部部属医疗机构临床重点学科项目
摘 要:目的研究人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者和获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS,艾滋病)患者CD8+T细胞激活分子CD38、人类白细胞Ⅱ类抗原(HLA-DR)与血浆HIV载量的相关性,分析用CD8+CD38+、CD8+HLA-DR+的比例替代HIV载量的可行性。方法采集1998—2006年期间在北京协和医院初诊的HIV感染者或AIDS患者236例和56名同期健康献血员的抗凝静脉血,用流式细胞术分析CD8+T细胞分别表达CD38和HLA-DR的比例,用分支DNA技术(bDNA)检测血浆病毒载量(VL)。用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分别预测VL>1×103拷贝/mL、>1×104拷贝/mL和>1×105拷贝/mL时CD8+CD38+、CD8+HLA-DR+比例的临界值范围。结果236例患者的CD4+T细胞计数138(16,262)×106/L,显著低于对照组(P<0.01);CD8+T细胞计数618(353,879),显著高于对照组(P<0.05);CD8+CD38+、CD8+HLA-DR+的比例分别为85.4%(72.5%,92.2%)和40.3%(17.5%,59.7%),显著高于对照组(P<0.01),与HIV载量的相关性分别为0.429(P<0.01)和0.282(P<0.01)。用CD8+CD38+>80.4%预测VL>1×103拷贝/mL的敏感度和特异度为80.6%和75.0%;用CD8+HLA-DR+预测VL>1×105拷贝/mL的敏感度和特异度为78.7%和81.4%。结论对HIV感染或AIDS初诊的患者可以尝试用CD38和HLA-DR激活亚群来预测血浆HIV载量,这种替代检测方法具有一定的可行性。Objective To investigate the correlation of CD38, HLA-DR abnormal activating expression on CD8^+ T with plasma viral load(VL) and evaluate the possibility of the economical CD38, HLA-DR test to substitute VL assay in HIV/ AIDS patients. Methods Clinical data and anti-coagulated venous blood samples were collected from 236 ARV naive HIV/AIDS patients during 1998--2006 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The percentages of CD38, HLA-DR on CD8^+ T were determined by flow cytometry and plasma HIV copies were detected with bDNA analyzer. All subjects were analyzed the correlation of CD38/HLA-DR with viral load. The cutoff percentages of CD38 and HLA-DR were evaluated with ROC area,including sensitivity and specificity for predictive VL 〉 1 × 10^3 copies/mL, 〉 1 × 10^4 copies/mL and 〉 1 × 10^5 copies/mL respectively. Results The median CD4^+ T count 138 ( 16,262) × 10^6/L in 236 cases,which was significantly lower than CD4^+ T of healthy donors ( P 〈 0. 01 ) while CD8^+ T counts was 618 ( 353,879 ) and CD8^+ CD38 ^+ , CD8 ^+ HLA-DR + percentage was 85. 4% (72. 5 % ,92. 2% )and 40. 3% (17. 5 % ,59. 7% ), which were respectively higher than healthy control(P 〈 0. 05, P 〈 0. 01 and P 〈 0. 01 ). Viral load was 4. 84(4.46,5.47 ) lg copies/mL. Moreover,plasma VL was positively related with CD38 and HLA-DR expression(r = 0. 429, P 〈 0. 01 and r = 0. 282, P 〈 0.01 ) on CD8 ^+ T. With optimal ROC analysis to control sensitivity and specificity for substitute method, the cutoff percentage of CD8^+ CD38^+ was 〉 80. 4% in predictive VL 〉 1 × 10^3 copies/mL with 80. 6% sensitivity and 75.0% specificity whereas CD8^+ HLA-DR ^+ percentage was 36. 7% in predictive VL 〉 1 × 10^5copies/mL with 78. 7% sensitivity and 81.4%. Conclusion The detection of CD38 and HLA-DR percentage expression on CD8^+ T before HAART may be available for prediction about plasma HIV load assay as substitute method to survey the disease progression.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...