检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《北方工业大学学报》2007年第2期40-44,50,共6页Journal of North China University of Technology
摘 要:近年来有关侵犯死者名誉的案件时有发生,尽管对于死者名誉的保护已成共识,但有关死者名誉保护的理论根据却众说纷纭,在司法实践和传统理论之间也出现矛盾,如何解决这一矛盾成为一个非常迫切的问题。法学界从各种角度为现有法律实践寻找理论根据,现有的一些观点各有利弊,但都未能合理解释实践与理论的矛盾。本文试图从民事权利能力制度角度,追本溯源地论证民事权利一般原则与特定领域的关系,分析民事权利在特定领域的突破源于民法理想的追求,并给出相关的立法思路和建议。In recent years, cases concerning undermining the deceased's reputation have often been heard. Though it is commonly acknowledged that the reputation of the deceased should be protected, there are different versions of the theory to this issue. Contradiction exists between legal practices and traditional theory. The legal field tries, from different aspects, to find out the theoretical background for current legal practices. However, with both their merits and demerits, the contradiction is yet to be solved. The paper tries to deal with the problem from the aspect of civil right capacity system, demonstrates the relation between the general principle and the specific field of civil right, and in a bid to pursue civil law perfection, puts forth relevant legal thoughts and proposals for the breakthrough of civil right ideal in specific fields.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49