机构地区:[1]中山大学器官移植研究所、中山大学附属第三医院肝移植中心,广州510630 [2]中山大学器官移植研究所感染科,广州510630
出 处:《中华肝脏病杂志》2007年第6期408-411,共4页Chinese Journal of Hepatology
基 金:广州市科技计划项目(200523-E0101);广东省科技项目(2005830501005);广东省科技项目(2006836003004)
摘 要:目的 探讨终末期肝病模型(MELD)在慢性重型肝炎患者的预后评估与治疗策略中的意义。方法 回顾性分析135例慢性重型肝炎患者的临床资料,计算患者入院时的MELD分值和接受治疗2周后的MELD分值与入院时MELD分值的差值(△MELD分值),分析MELD分值和△MELD分值与患者3个月病死率的关系。结果 入院时MELD分值死亡组患者为37.00±6.50,存活组为25.80±5.20,死亡组患者入院时的MELD分值远高于存活组,两组间差异有统计学意义(x^2=72.00,P〈0.01),接受治疗2周后△MELD分值死亡组患者为1.57±0.89,存活组为-0.99±0.73,两组间差异有统计学意义(x^2=56.35,P〈0.01)。患者入院时MELD分值和接受治疗2周后△MELD分值预测慢性重型肝炎患者3个月内病死率的c-统计值分别为0.90和0.76。MELD分值〈25组,患者3个月后病死率为2%,25≤MELD分值≤30组病死率为7%,300组和≤0组的病死率分别为51%和13%,两组间病死率差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论 MELD分值和△MELD分值越高,慢性重型肝炎患者的病死率越高,MELD能较准确地预测慢性重型肝炎患者的预后,可以结合患者入院时的MELD分值和接受治疗后的△MELD分值来决定慢性重型肝炎患者的治疗方案。Objective To investigate the prognosis evaluation and treatment strategy of chronic severe hepatitis (CSH) patients using a model of end-stage liver disease (MELD). Methods The MELD scores of 135 CSH patients on the day of their admittance to our hospital and the AMELD scoresafter twoweeks of medical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. They were also compared with the scores of the three-month mortality rate of the patients. Results The mean MELD score calculated on the first day of the patients who died after their admission to the hospital was 37.00 ± 6.50, while that of the living group was 25.80 ± 5.20. The difference was highly significant ( x^2 = 72.00, P 〈 0.01). AMELD score after two-weeks medical treatment of the patients who died was 1.57 ±0.89, while that of the living group was-0.99 ± 0.73; the difference was also highly significant ( x^2 = 56.35, P 〈 0.01). The area under the ROC curve of MELD score (c-statistic) was 0.90, while the c-statistic for AMELD score was 0.76. On the first day of their admission, when the MELD score was 〈 25, the three-month mortality rate was 2%; when it was 25 ≤ MELD score ≤ 30, the three-month mortality rate was 7%; when it was 30 〈 MELD score 〈 35, the three-month mortality rate was 43%; and when MELD score≥35, the three-month mortality rate was 81%; the differences between these groups were all highly significant (P 〈 0.01). When AMELD scores were above zero, the three-month mortality was 51%, and when AMELD scores were less than or equal to zero, the three-month mortality rate was 13%. All the differences were highly significant (P 〈 0.01). Conclusions A high MELD score and a high A MELD score herald high three-month mortality rates in patients with CSH. MELD is quite usable in assessing the prognosis in patients suffering CSH. The choice of treatment for the CSH patients could be made by integrating the MELD score calculated on the first day of being admitted to a hospital and the A MELD score after their medic
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...