综采放顶和一次采全高两种采煤方式对煤炭质量影响与效益测算  被引量:5

To Compare Effects of Two Method on Coal Quality and Economic Results between the Fully-mechanized Mining with Roof Caving and the method of One-time Cutting Whole Height

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:於春慧 佟大光 张建忠[1] 王革良 刘伟更 冯继权 

机构地区:[1]铁法煤业集团公司 煤炭销售分公司,辽宁调兵山112700 [2]铁法煤业集团公司 大隆矿,辽宁调兵山112700

出  处:《煤》2007年第6期7-9,17,共4页Coal

摘  要:对于当前热力推广的综采放顶煤技术,作者从科学发展观的高度,通过对大隆矿S1702工作面综采放顶和一次采全高两种采煤方式的对比试验与效益测算,说明:无论是产品质量还是企业经济效益,一次采全高方法都明显优于综采放顶方式,是在可能条件下应首选的采煤方式。Considering that the fact that of the method of fully-mechanized mining with roof caving is in prevailing now, the author took the coal seam of No.S1702 in the Dalong Mine as the example to compare the fully-mechanized mining with roof caving with the method of onetime cutting whole height. Based on the comparison and analysis it is shown that the method of one-time cutting whole height show the advantages over the other method both for the product quality and economic benefits. So, the conclusion is given that the method of one-time cutting whole height will be preferred if the conditions are possible.

关 键 词:综采放顶煤 采全高 质量对比 效益 

分 类 号:TD82[矿业工程—煤矿开采]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象