检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:於春慧 佟大光 张建忠[1] 王革良 刘伟更 冯继权
机构地区:[1]铁法煤业集团公司 煤炭销售分公司,辽宁调兵山112700 [2]铁法煤业集团公司 大隆矿,辽宁调兵山112700
出 处:《煤》2007年第6期7-9,17,共4页Coal
摘 要:对于当前热力推广的综采放顶煤技术,作者从科学发展观的高度,通过对大隆矿S1702工作面综采放顶和一次采全高两种采煤方式的对比试验与效益测算,说明:无论是产品质量还是企业经济效益,一次采全高方法都明显优于综采放顶方式,是在可能条件下应首选的采煤方式。Considering that the fact that of the method of fully-mechanized mining with roof caving is in prevailing now, the author took the coal seam of No.S1702 in the Dalong Mine as the example to compare the fully-mechanized mining with roof caving with the method of onetime cutting whole height. Based on the comparison and analysis it is shown that the method of one-time cutting whole height show the advantages over the other method both for the product quality and economic benefits. So, the conclusion is given that the method of one-time cutting whole height will be preferred if the conditions are possible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3