两种非相干干扰对空空导弹毁伤压制的比较  

The Comparison of Kill Probability of AAM Response to Two Incoherent Jamming Methods

作　　者：孙毓富[1] 栗苹[1] 吕红剑[1] 王建涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京理工大学机电工程学院,北京100081

出　　处：《弹箭与制导学报》2007年第2期50-52,56,共4页Journal of Projectiles,Rockets,Missiles and Guidance

摘　　要：为了比较两种干扰效果,首先建立双点源恒定干扰的雷达导引头干扰模型,再分析闪烁干扰作用模型,给出仿真条件下双机干闪烁干扰的干扰效果,得出两种干扰模式下导弹分辨角。在最大可用过载下对导弹的极限测边界进行了仿真,通过极限弹道计算出两点恒定干扰和闪烁干扰下的导弹攻击区域,说明闪烁干扰的优势所在。同时通过对最佳脱靶量的分析,给出闪烁干扰双机间最佳掩护距离。在假定导弹误差服从瑞利分布条件下,对两种干扰条件下单发导弹的毁伤概率对比评估。In order to compare the two jamming methods effect, modeling the dual-resource invariable jamming to radar seeker firstly, then a signal module is analyzed for blinking jamming sources, and acquiring the seeker resolution angle by simulation data, assume AAM always attack the target with it＇s max normal acceleration after its target＇s view angle exceed the resolving angle, a miss distance is work out to compared it with incoherent invariable jamming. An optimized distance between two transmitters is obviously to be looked for. Presume the miss distance distribution is according to Rayleigh distribution, a research of different kill probability of two jamming methods was conduct for assessment.

关 键 词：单脉冲 闪烁干扰 毁伤概率 

分 类 号：TJ765.331[兵器科学与技术—武器系统与运用工程]