检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《体育学刊》2007年第4期19-21,共3页Journal of Physical Education
基 金:江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目(课题号:05SJD890004);中国矿业大学科研基金项目(课题号:0ZR4568)
摘 要:对奥运会举办国(美国、日本、韩国)后奥运竞技体育体制变化进行分析,然后从我国竞技体育体制管理模式、人才培养体制、投资主体和运行模式以及法律法规环境等方面对后奥运我国竞技体育体制的改革进行了研究。结果认为:后奥运我国竞技体育的管理模式由政府管理型向政府与体育协会合作型发展;加快竞技体育后备人才培养体制的改革;实现竞技体育由国家投资到市场化运作的转变,进一步开发、完善竞技体育的竞赛市场;进一步完善我国竞技体育的法律、法规。The authors analyzed the changes of the post-Olympic competitive sports system of Olympic Games hosting countries (America, Japan and Korea), studied the reform of the competitive sports system of China in such 4 aspects as the mode of system management, talent cultivation system, main body of investment and running mode, as well as legal and legislative environments with respect to competitive sport in China, and drew the following conclusions: The mode of management of post-Olympic competitive sport in China is developing from government management type to government and sports association cooperation type; the reform of competitive sports backup talent cultivation system should be speeded up; the change of competitive sport from state investment to market orientated operation should be realized, and the market of competition of competitive sport should be further developed; the laws and legislations for competitive sport in China should be further perfected.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.238.183