检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:茅泽育[1] 许昕[1] 王爱民[1] 张磊[1] 岳光溪[2]
机构地区:[1]清华大学水利水电工程系,北京100084 [2]清华大学热能工程系,北京100084
出 处:《水利水电科技进展》2007年第3期76-80,94,共6页Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources
基 金:国家自然科学基金(50579030)
摘 要:对国际上现有各种冰坝预测模型进行分析比较,并讨论了各自的优缺点。认为现有的大多数模型是针对某一特定河段建立的,没有一种模型具有明显优势;各种模型的预测结果均具有较大取伪误差,模型中参数选择具有任意性。提出了进一步的研究方向:为了减小预测误差,应增加模型中的变量,并采用统计方法如逐步回归法确定模型变量;为了评价预报结果的可靠性,应对预测误差(包括取伪误差和弃真误差)进行定量分析;对冰坝形成及溃决的机理应进行深入研究。The existing breakup ice-jam prediction methods and their potential advantages and disadvantages were briefly reviewed. It is pointed out that most of the models used were developed for specific river reaches, none of them showing evident advantages, and that the predicted results by each model are of high false-positive error induced by arbitrary selection of model variables. Thus, it is suggested that statistics methods, such as stepwise regression, should be adopted to determine the model variables and more variables should be included so as to decrease the prediction error, and that the prediction errors, including the false-positive error and false-negative error, should be quantitatively analyzed for evaluation of the reliability of the predicted results. Moreover, the mechanism of ice-jam formation and breakup should be emphasized in further study.
分 类 号:TV124[水利工程—水文学及水资源]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.122.53