检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴利民[1] 张燕青[1] 余永强[1] 黄东永[1] 崔凤金[1] 黄仕光[1] 肖景舟[1]
出 处:《岭南现代临床外科》2007年第3期213-214,219,共3页Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨应用普通股骨髓腔扩大绞刀代替专用的椎间植骨器械,进行腰椎后路椎间植骨融合术的临床经验体会,评估治疗效果。方法对我院34例应用股骨髓腔绞刀进行腰椎后路椎间植骨融合术的病例资料,进行回顾性分析。结果本组34例无围手术期硬膜及神经根损伤,无伤感染和和植骨块松脱。随访5~6年,植骨全部于6~8个月愈合,无一例植骨塌陷。按Machnab标准评定:优21例,良11例,可2例,差0例,优良率94.12%。结论改良应用股骨髓腔扩大绞刀代替专用的椎间植骨器械,作椎间植骨床的准备,效果满意,安全方便。Objective To investigate the use experience of common femoral enlarged reamer instead of special intervertebral bone grafting instrument and therap medulary cavity utic effect were evaluated. Methods From January 2001 to May 2006,34 cases with femoral medulary cavity reamer received lumbar posterior approach intervertebral bone grafting fusion were analyzed retrospectively. Results No injuries of dura and nerve root, no wound infection and displacement of bone grafting piece were found in all cases during perioperative period. With follow-up was 5 to 6 years. Bone grafting healing was 6 to 8 months after operation No bone grafting was collapse in this group. According to Machnab creteria score, the excellent, good, and fair were in 21, 11 and 2 cases respectively. The excellent and good rate were 94.12%. Conclusion Modified use of femoral medulary cavity enlarged reamer has satisfactory efficacy and safe for intervertebral bone
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28