《广雅》考释二条  

Analyzing the Two Doubted Entries of Guangya(广雅)

作　　者：曹海东[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学语言与语言教育研究中心,武汉430079

出　　处：《语言研究》2007年第2期123-125,共3页Studies in Language and Linguistics

基　　金：华中师范大学语言与语言教育研究中心211工程项目"小句中枢说在汉语与临界领域研究中的应用与验证"

摘　　要：今传本《广雅·释言》有“乡,救也”、“叠,怀也”二条,王念孙均注“未详”。王氏之后虽有学者为之疏证,似亦未达其旨。前一条中的“乡”当读为“(?)(向)”,而“救”与“求”通,二者皆有追求之义;后一条中的“怀”通“坏”,意为垮塌、坠落,可与“叠”字同义。There were two entries： the Xiang（乡）, Jiuye（救也） and Die（叠）, Huaiye（怀也） in Guangya （广雅）, which were all annotated as doubtful and uncertain terms by Wang nian-sun（王念孙）. The essay argues that although some scholars attempted after Wang（乡） to make the entries understood clearly, yet they all failed to do so. The essay suggests that in the first entry Xiang（乡）is Xiang（嚮 or 向）, Jiu（救） is Qiu（求） as phonetic loan characters, they actually mean pursue. In the other one Huai （怀） is Huai （坏）, its meaning is fall and break, as a synonym of Die （叠） in meaning.

关 键 词：《广雅》 叠 怀 乡 救 

分 类 号：H131.4[语言文字—汉语]