“五四”文化语境下《玩偶之家》的多元阐释  

"The May 4th" Cultural Context and the Multivariate Explanations of A Doll's House

作　　者：李定清[1] 

机构地区：[1]襄樊学院中文系,湖北襄樊441053

出　　处：《襄樊学院学报》2007年第6期26-31,共6页Journal of Xiangfan University

摘　　要：面对《玩偶之家》中娜拉出走后留下的巨大问号,人们基于不同的立场和态度,曾作出并一直延续着种种不同的猜测。在我国,鲁迅出于个人本位主义立场,指出娜拉不是堕落就是回来的出路,明显体现着由"启蒙"到"立人"的文化指向。胡适基于自由人本主义世界观,指出娜拉"救出自己"、走向个性解放的出路,演绎的是"健全的个人主义"的文化逻辑。郭沫若以理想的社会本位意识为旨归,指明娜拉走向革命的出路,是对易卜生的"问号"作出的经典性回应。他们指出的不同出路,都是不同文化个性和文化选择作用的结果。Facing the big question mark given by Norag leaving in A Doll＆ House, researchers with different positions, attitudes and cultural contexts are having given various answers to this question. In our country, based on individual humanism position, LU Xun points out Nora＇s outlet is either degeneration or coming back, which obviously embodies the cultural orientation of from ＂enlightenment＂ to ＂standing a man＂. Based on liberty humanism world view, Hu Shi insists that Nora will ＂save herself＂ and go on the way of individual emancipation, which expresses a cultural logic of ＂ sound egoism＂. Guo Moruo, based on the ideal social standard sense, makes a classic answer for Ibsen＇s question that Nora will head for the revolution. These different outlets given by the researchers are the result of impact of cultural personalities and cultural options.

关 键 词：鲁迅 胡适 郭沫若 易卜生 《玩偶之家》 

分 类 号：I106.3[文学—世界文学]