检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余琳
机构地区:[1]河南煤炭卫生学校附院,河南平顶山467013
出 处:《现代保健(医学创新研究)》2007年第05Z期1-2,共2页
摘 要:目的 比较万拉法辛与阿米替林治疗抑郁症患者疗效及安全性.方法 将64例住院的抑郁症患者随机分为服用万拉法辛组和阿米替林组,均治疗8周,用汉米尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、临床疗效总评量表(CGI)和副反应量表(TESS)在治疗前及治疗末第12、4、8周比较两组的疗效和安全性.结果 治疗8周两组均有明显的疗效,两组间比较差异无显著性;治疗8周末以万拉法辛组显著较好,万拉法辛组不良反应发生率远低于阿米替林组.结论 抑郁症患者对万拉法辛安全性好疗效高,不良反应少于阿米替林组.Objective To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of venlafaxime and clomipramine in the treatment of depression. Method 64 patients with depression were randomly divided into catalpa or mirtazapine group for 8 weeks . The efficacy and side effects were evaluated with Hamilton depression scale ( HAMD), clinical global impression severity of illness ( CGL - SI) and treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS) . Results After 8 weeks treatments, significant improvement was observed in both groups, but no significant in clomipramine group , however the adverse effects was much less in venlafaxime group than in clomipramine group. Conclusion Venlafaxime has better efficacy and less adverse in the maintenance theatment of depression.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90