剥削与正义——“分析马克思主义”的理论分歧及问题辨析  

Exploitation and Justice——Disagreement and Arguements Among Analytical Marxists

作　　者：曹玉涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]洛阳师范学院政法学院,河南洛阳471022

出　　处：《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2007年第4期17-20,共4页Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University

基　　金：2007年度国家社会科学基金项目"分析的马克思主义"的正义论研究(07CKS006)

摘　　要：分析马克思主义是一股新兴的西方马克思主义哲学思潮,其关于剥削是否正义的争论在西方哲学界引起了很大轰动,也造成了极大混乱。分析马克思主义的伍德一派主张马克思反对正义,肯定资本主义剥削的正义性。而胡萨米一派则认为马克思赞成正义,批判资本主义剥削的非正义。二者争论的实质在于没有理解马克思评价社会历史的两个尺度及其辩证关系。Analytical Marxism is a new trend of west Marxist philosophy, its debate whether exploitation is justice or not cause a great sensation and bring about great confuse. Wood, an analytical Marxist, argues that Marx opposes justice, and affirms that capitalism exploitation is just. However, Husami, another analytical Marxist, thinks that Marx is in favor of justice and criticizes capitalism exploitation＇s injustice. The essence of their arguements is that neither of them understand Marx＇s two measures of evaluation of society and history, nor understand dialectical relation between them.

关 键 词：剥削 正义 历史尺度 价值尺度 

分 类 号：B08[哲学宗教—哲学理论]