高层建筑结构扭转振动效应控制研究  

RESEARCH ON TORSIONAL VIBRATION CONTROL OF TALL BUILDING STRUCTURES

作　　者：蔡健[1] 潘东辉[1] 黄炎生[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学土木工程系,广东广州510640

出　　处：《工程力学》2007年第7期116-121,共6页Engineering Mechanics

基　　金：广东省自然科学基金资助项目(020965)

摘　　要：《高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程》限制高层建筑结构扭转不规则性的规定存在问题,控制扭转振动的措施需进一步讨论。规程为避免严重扭转不规则结构的出现,除对位移比进行限制外,还限制了扭转为主第一周期与平动为主的第一周期的比值,即高层结构设计应满足平扭耦联周期比的要求。通过改变结构的偏心率、扭转刚度和侧向刚度等因素,并分析耦联周期比和非耦联周期比的差别,发现规程在某些情况下并不能保证对扭转振动效应的控制效果。因此用耦联周期比限制结构扭转不规则性的措施不尽合理,设计中可采用平动变形能和扭转变形能的比值代替耦联周期比作为控制扭转振动的指标。The provisions in Technical Specification for Concrete Structures of Tall Building on torsional irregularity are problematic and the specified measures for torsional vibration control need to be revisited. The ratio of torsion-controlled first period to translation-controlled first period （i.e. the coupled period ratio）, combined with the drift ratio, is incorporated in the specification to exclude tall structures with severe torsional irregularity, and its limits should be satisfied in seismic design. By changing the magnitudes of the parameters （i.e. eccentricity, torsional stiffness, and lateral stiffness）, the analysis of the difference between the coupled period ratio and uncoupled period ratio shows that the provisions cannot guarantee torsional vibration control in certain situations. In this respect, the coupled-period-ratio index is not well-founded and the ratio of lateral energy to torsional energy is proposed as an alternative.

关 键 词：高层建筑结构 扭转振动效应 耦联周期比 非耦联周期比 能量比 

分 类 号：TU375[建筑科学—结构工程] TU311.3