上海残疾人康复服务评价指标体系指标量化研究  被引量:6

Quantitive Study on the Evaluation Index System of Rehabilitation Service for All Disabled in Shanghai

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈刚[1] 吕军[1] 虞慧炯[2] 罗志坤[2] 张文红[1] 徐依依[1] 刘英涛[1] 王海东[2] 傅传威[2] 

机构地区:[1]复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海市200032 [2]上海市残疾人联合会,上海市200127

出  处:《中国康复理论与实践》2007年第7期681-683,共3页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice

摘  要:目的确立上海市残疾人“人人享有康复服务”评价指标体系中各指标的分值与三级指标的目标值。方法系统采用文献评阅、问卷调查、现场调查、专家咨询和Delphi法等定性和定量研究方法为评价指标确立分值和指标值。结果三轮专家咨询积极系数为100%、100%和92.3%;专家权威程度系数为0.84,专家协调系数为0.79和0.72。8个一级指标中,权重居前的社区康复、经费保障、组织网络和政策环境权重系数分别为0.1836、0.1781、0.1360和0.1274。结论本指标体系专家积极性高,权威性和协调性好,筛选出的指标权重为残疾人康复评价提供依据。Objective To create the target value of third-degree index and the weight coefficient of evaluation index system of rehabilitation service for all disabled in Shanghai. Methods Compositive quantitative and qualitative research methods, such as document analysis, Delphi method, questionnaire survey, specialist consultation were carried in the study. Results The enthusiasm coefficient of specialist in three times were 100%, 100% , 92.3% respectively, the degree of specialist authority was 0.84, the coordination coefficient of specialist for the first- and second-index were 0.79 and 0. 72 respectively. The weight of the more important firstdegree index namely community rehabilitation, outlay support, organization network and policy environment were 0. 1836, 0. 1781, 0. 1360 and 0. 1274. Conclusion The enthusiasm, authority and coordination of specialist of this evaluation index system are high. The index weight can offer evaluation basement.

关 键 词:残疾人 康复 评价指标体系 特尔菲法 

分 类 号:R195.1[医药卫生—卫生统计学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象