转型的悖论与悖论的转型——基于“中国模式”对新古典转型经济理论的批判  

The Paradox of Transition and the Transition of Paradox——the criticism on the Neoclassical Theory of Transitional Economy Based on the “Chinese Pattern”

作　　者：靳涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学经济研究所,副教授361005

出　　处：《江苏社会科学》2007年第2期59-64,共6页Jiangsu Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目<从20世纪两次逆向经济体制转型的实践透视马克思经济学与西方经济学的科学价值>(批准号:05BJL043)的资助

摘　　要：转型的目的不是单纯为了转型而转型,转型的目的是更好地获得经济增长,如果忽视了转型的增长取向而把关注点仅集中到狭隘的转型本身,那么必然会造成舍本趋末的结果,而西方主流新古典经济学在转型问题上的所犯的错误正是如此。“中国模式”是一种寻求社会发展和经济增长不断持续推进的有效模式,随着“中国模式”正被越来越的人们所接受,人们对西方主流新古典经济学的所倡导的那种简单化、绝对化和“为转型而转型”转型观表现出了更多的质疑和批判。The purpose of transition is not just transition. The purpose of transition is to achieve better economic growth. The Western Neoclassical Economics has made a great mistake by neglecting the orientation of growth in transition. The ＂Chinese pattern＂, as a kind of effective pattern of seeking social development and continuously promoting economic growth, is being accepted by more and more countries. Now people increasingly question and criticize the simplified and absolute views of transition advocated by Western Neoclassical Economics.

关 键 词：转型 悖论 质疑 批判 

分 类 号：F091.3[经济管理—政治经济学]