检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴攀文[1] 王伟伟[2] 周材权[1] 胡锦矗[1]
机构地区:[1]西华师范大学生命科学学院 [2]西华师范大学历史文化学院,四川南充637002
出 处:《动物分类学报》2007年第3期502-504,共3页Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30470261 ;30570275);四川省重点学科重点资助项目(SZD0420)资助
摘 要:目前甘肃鼢鼠Myospalax cansus、高原鼢鼠M.baileyi、秦岭鼢鼠M.rufescens的分类地位一直存有争议,多涉及到与中华鼢鼠M.fontanierii的分类关系。本文分别从成体甘肃鼢鼠、高原鼢鼠、秦岭鼢鼠、中华鼢鼠标本的胡须、头部、背部、腹部、前肢取毛样,经清洗和处理后,在倒置显微镜下观察,用目镜测微尺分别测量和计算其5个部位毛发的毛髓质指数。结果表明:甘肃鼢鼠与中华鼢鼠除胡须髓质指数无显著性差异外,其它部位及各部位综合均有显著差异。高原鼢鼠与秦岭鼢鼠除前肢毛髓质指数无显著性差异外,其它部位及各部位综合均有显著差异;与中华鼢鼠除前肢毛髓质指数无显著差异,其它部位及各部位综合均有显著差异。秦岭鼢鼠除与甘肃鼢鼠的腹部及与中华鼢鼠、高原鼢鼠的前肢毛髓质指数无显著差异外,与其它鼢鼠其余部位及各部位综合均有显著性差异。综合考虑,本研究结果支持甘肃鼢鼠、高原鼢鼠、秦岭鼢鼠各自独立为种的观点。The taxonomic statuses of Gansu zokor ( Myospalax), Plateau zokor ( M. baileyi) and Qinling zokor ( M.rufescens) have been debated for many years, and often relate to Ghinese zokor ( M.fontanierii). In the study, guide hairs from around the mouth, head, back, abdomen and forelimb of each species were chosen from the specimens of adult M. fontanierii, M. cansus, M. baileyi and M. rufesoens respectively. After treated serially, with the eyepiece micrometer in the inverted microscope, we made measurements of the widths of hairs and medullas and then calculated the medullary indexes of straight guard hairs from around the mouth, head, back, abdomen and forelimb of each species. The results indicate that: viewing at each of the five parts, there were no significant differences in the medullary indexes of whiskers between M. cansus and M. fontanierii, in those of forelimbs between M. baileyi and M, rufescens & betweenM, baileyi and M,fontanierii, inthose of abdomen between M. rufescens and M.cansus, and in those of forelimbs between M. rufescens and M. fontanierii & between M. rufescens and M. baileyi. Expect for the above-mentioned parts in which the medullary indexes were of no significant differences, significant differences were found in the other parts and the mixture of the five parts between M. cansus and M. fontanierii, between M. baileyi and M. rufescens, between M. baileyi and M. fontanierii, between M. rufescens and M.cansus, between M. rufescens and M. fontanierii. The standpoints that M.cansus,and M.baileyi and M. rufescens were listed as valid species respectively are supported by this study.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.159