检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医药导报》2007年第08S期29-30,共2页China Medical Herald
摘 要:目的:比较加替沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗泌尿系统感染的成本-效果分析。方法:采用药物经济学原理对两种治疗方案进行成本-效果分析。结果:加替沙星组与左氧氟沙星组治疗泌尿系统感染的有效率分别为93.75%、87.50%(P>0.05);不良反应发生率分别为6.3%、8.3%(P>0.05);成本-效果比(C/E)分别为8.75、4.31。与左氧氟沙星组相比,加替沙星组每增加一个单位效果需多花费70.91元。结论:左氧氟沙星治疗泌尿系统感染的成本-效果比优于加替沙星。Objective: To compare the cost-effectiveness ratio of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin in the treatment of patients with infection in urinary system. Methods: Principle of pharmacoeconomics was adopted to analyze the cost-effectiveness of two treatment schemes. Results: The effective rates of gatifloxacin group and levofloxacin group in the treatment of urinary system infection were 93.75% and 87.50% (P〉0.05) respectively;the incidence rates of adverse reactions were 6.3% and 8.3%(P〉0.05) ;The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 8.75 and 4.31 respectively. The cost for every one unit increment of effectiveness for gatifloxacin group was 70.91 Yuan more than that of the levofloxacin group. Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness ratio of levofloxacin is superior to that of gatifloxacin in the treatment of urinary system infection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28