检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:夏吟兰[1]
出 处:《吉林大学社会科学学报》2007年第4期63-71,共9页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:从家族本位到子女本位、从家长权力到父母责任、从家长决定子女的命运到子女最大利益原则,发端于20世纪下半叶的亲子关系立法改革席卷全球,并带动了离婚亲子关系的立法变革,成为本世纪离婚亲子关系立法不可逆转的大趋势。尽管我国离婚亲子关系立法已经考虑到了子女利益,并以保护子女权益为己任,但这种保护仍是以家长和社会利益为视角的,没有充分考虑子女的权利和愿望,没有将他们真正作为权利主体。以"子女本位"审视我国相关法律规定和司法解释,仍然可以发现不少"父母本位"立法思想的痕迹。转变立法观念、完善离婚亲子关系立法势在必行。Legislative reform of the relationship between parent and child, featured with the change from family-based standard to child-based standard, from parental power to parental responsibility, from standard of child' s fate decided by parent to standard of protecting the maximum interest of child, which began at the second half of the 20th century has become irresistible trend in this century. This reform has swept the entire world and has incurred the legislative reform about the relationship between parent and child on divorce. Although our country' s legislation about parent-child relationship on divorce has taken into account the interest of child and taken the protection of it as its main task, such protection is on the parent and social interest perspective, still, and does not sufficiently consider the rights and aspirations of child, hence, it does not take child as the real Right Main. We can find that there are still many legisla- tive marks based on the parent-based standard, if we scrutinize our country' s law and judicial interpretation thereof from the child-based standard perspective. prove legislation about relationship between parent and It is necessary to change legislative view and imchild on divorce.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171