折皱回复角测试方法  

Testing methods of crease recovery angle

作　　者：盛爱军[1] 张建祥 耿彩花 

机构地区：[1]德州学院纺织工程系,山东德州253015 [2]鲁泰纺织股份有限公司,山东淄博255100

出　　处：《印染》2007年第15期38-41,共4页China Dyeing and Finishing

摘　　要：采用Shirley折皱回复性能测试仪,比较了ISO 2313(GB/T3819)、AATCC 66、MS P22纺织品折皱回复角测试标准的差异,以及与国产YG(B)541D型和孟山都式折皱回复性能测试仪的不同点。试验结果表明,采用AATCC 66标准测得的折皱回复角较大;除纬重平组织织物外,测试样品的经向回复角均大于纬向折皱回复角,这与洗后平整度有很大的关系。Testing methods of crease recovery angle are different in various countries. This article compared the difference among three testing methods and related instruments of ISO, AATCC and GB standards, it was found that recovery angle was the biggest tested by AATCC 66 standard, crease recovery angle of warp was bigger than weft; recovery angle had highly dependent on levelness after laundering.

关 键 词：测试 折皱回复角 方法标准 

分 类 号：TS197[轻工技术与工程—纺织化学与染整工程]