技术伦理如何避开人类中心主义和生物中心主义——约纳斯《责任的命令:寻求技术时代的伦理》解读  

Technology and Responsibility Transcends the Anthropocentrism and Non-anthropocentrism——A Reading of Jonas' The Imperative of Responsibility:In Search of An Ethics for the Technological Age

作　　者：张新樟[1] 汪建达[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学教育学院,杭州310028

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2007年第8期6-10,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(04CZJ001);浙江大学基督教与跨文化研究中心项目

摘　　要：存在主义哲学家约纳斯撰写的《责任的命令:寻求技术时代的伦理》是当代环境伦理学的名著,德文版在不到10年的时间里重印了九次,销售了20万册,"责任的命令"成了德国绿党及其同情者的口令。自费希特与黑格尔以来,从未有哪一本哲学著作如此大地影响公众生活。本文基于该著的解读,认为约纳斯的技术伦理克服了现代虚无主义,避免了人类中心主义与生物中心主义的纷争,为环境伦理奠定了一个可靠的形而上学基础。The Imperative of Responsibility： In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age written by Hans Jonas had a significant impact on the Green movement in Germany, within a decade this book had to be reprinted nine times, has sold close 200,000 copies in Germen. Not since the time of Johann Gottlieb Fichte and Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel, had the work of philosophers so influenced public life. The article based on the reading of this work, tries to show that the ethics offered by Jonas＇ successfully overcome modern nihilism, while transcending the strife between non-anthropocentrism and anthropocentrism, found a firm metaphysical ground for environmental ethics.

关 键 词：约纳斯 技术伦理 虚无主义 责任的命令 人类中心主义 非人类中心主义 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]