检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁新华[1]
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2007年第9期790-793,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:北京林业大学振兴计划人才培养专项课题资助(项目编号:200303021)
摘 要:目的探讨大学生社会支持状况与主观幸福感之间的关系。方法使用社会支持评定量表和主观幸福感指数量表对420名大学生进行问卷调查。结果1社会支持各维度与主观幸福感各指数均呈显著的相关关系。2高社会支持组和低社会支持组被试在幸福感各指数上均存在着极其显著的差异。3客观支持和对支持的利用度对主观幸福感的情感成分(积极情感和消极情感)有较好的预测作用,主观支持则对主观幸福感的认知成分(生活满意度)有较好的预测作用。结论大学生的社会支持状况和主观幸福感各指数存在显著的相关关系,不同属性的社会支持对主观幸福感各指数的预测作用不同。Objective To explore the relationship between social support and subjective well-being (SWB) in university students. Methods 420 university students were administered by social support scale and index of subjective well-being scale. Results (1)The subscales of social support were significantly related to all the indexes of SWB.(2)There were significant differences between students of high social support and those of low social support. (3)Stepwise regression analysis revealed that objective social support and utilization of social support were significant predictors for emotion subscale of SWB (Positive Emotion and Negative Emotion), Subjective social support was significant predictor for cognition subscale of SWB (Life Satisfaction). Conclusion There were significant correlation between social support and SWB in university students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166