检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州医学院附属深圳沙井医院,深圳市沙井人民医院,深圳市518104
出 处:《中国药房》2007年第23期1771-1773,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:评价治疗细菌性上呼吸道感染的4种抗生素药物的成本-效果。方法:将102例细菌性上呼吸道感染患者随机分为G1、G2、G3、G4组,分别给予琥乙红霉素分散片、罗红霉素胶囊、阿奇霉素分散片、克林霉素分散片治疗,疗程分别为10、10、5、10d,运用药物经济学方法进行成本-效果分析。结果:G1、G2、G3、G4组的成本分别为143.20、114.00、69.55、323.20元;有效率分别为88.89%、91.67%、91.30%、92.86%(P>0.05);成本-效果比分别为161.10、124.36、76.18、348.05;G1、G2、G4组相对于G3组增量成本-效果比分别为—3056.02、12013.51、16259.62,G1、G2、G4组的成本-效果比显著高于G3组(P<0.05)。结论:阿奇霉素分散片治疗方案较好。OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost- effectiveness of four antibiotics in the treatment of bacterial upper respiratory tract infection.METHODS: A total of 102 patients with bacterial upper respiratory tract infection were randomly assigned to receive Erythromycin ethylsuccinate dispersible tablets for 10 days(Group 1), roxithromycin capsules for 10 days (Group 2), azithromycin dispersible tablets for 5 days(Group 3) or klindamycin dispersible tablets for 10 days(Group 4) .The cost- effectiveness analysis was performed with pharmacoeconomic method.RESULTS:The costs of Groups 1,2,3 and 4 were 143.20 yuan, 114.00 yuan, 69.55 yuan and 323.20 yuan, respectively; the effective rates were 88.89%, 91.67%, 91.30% and 92.86%, respectively(P 〉 0.05); and the cost- effectiveness ratios were 161.10,124.36, 76.18 and 348.05, respectively .The incremental cost- effectiveness ratios of Groups 1, 2 and 4 were -3 056.02, 12 013.51 and 16 259.62 respectively as compared with Group 3.The cost - effectiveness ratios of Groups 1,2 and 4 were significantly higher as against Group 3(P 〈 0.05).CONCLUSION:Azithromycin dispersible tablet is the best one among the 4 groups.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28