检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李春霞[1] 王俊忠[2] 李友军[1] 李胜利 杨艳萍 熊瑛[1] 陈阜[5]
机构地区:[1]河南科技大学农学院,河南洛阳471003 [2]河南省农学会,河南郑州453002 [3]河南省焦作市修武县农技站,河南焦作454100 [4]河南省孟津县第一高级中学,河南洛阳471100 [5]中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,北京100094
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2007年第22期6739-6740,6742,共3页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家科技重大专项资助项目(2004BA520A14)
摘 要:对华北平原不同保护性耕作方式下冬小麦生长及产量效益的影响进行了研究。试验设置了秸秆不还田翻耕、秸秆还田翻耕、秸秆还田旋耕、秸秆还田免耕4个处理。结果表明:从冬小麦的地上部和地下部生长情况和产量、产值来看,多数性状表现为秸秆还田翻耕>秸秆还田旋耕>秸秆还田免耕;从劳动生产率来看,秸秆还田免耕的劳动生产率最高为24.48%,其次为秸秆还田翻耕,再次为秸秆还田旋耕,对照的劳动生产率为最低;从产投比来看,秸秆还田旋耕处理的经济效益较好,适宜推广。The growth and yield of the winter wheat under different protective tillage in the North of China plain were studied. Four treatments were set: no straw returning and deep-tillage (NSDT), straw returning and deep-tillage (SDT), straw returning and rotary-tillage (SRT) and straw returning and notillage (SNT). The results showed that from the growth and productivity of winter wheat, SDT 〉 SRT 〉 SNT in the most of the traits. The labor productivi- ty of SNT was 24.d8%, which was the highest. The labor productivity of SDT, SRT and NSDT was 21.06%, 18.86% and 15.45% respectively. According to the ratio of outputs to inputs, the economic benefits of SRT were the highest, which was suitable for promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42