检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孔丹莉[1] 张广恩[2] 潘海燕[1] 胡利人[1] 丁元林[1]
机构地区:[1]广东医学院公共卫生学院,广东湛江524023 [2]海南省海口市疾病预防控制中心,海南海口570000
出 处:《中国慢性病预防与控制》2007年第3期202-204,共3页Chinese Journal of Prevention and Control of Chronic Diseases
基 金:广东省自然科学基金项目资助(ZK0402);广东省湛江市招标项目资助(ZK0302)
摘 要:目的通过对引进的中文版糖尿病特异性生存质量量表(CN-ADDQOL)的信度和效度进行评价,旨在为糖尿病患者生存质量的测评提供敏感、有效的工具。方法对697例糖尿病患者采用相关分析和结构方程模型对CN-ADDQOL的信度和效度进行评价。结果CN-ADDQOL的Cronbachα系数为0.941,表明量表具有很好的内部一致性;CN-ADDQOL19个条目的因子载荷均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且绝大部分条目的因子载荷值均在0.4以上,说明量表具有较好的结构效度。结论CN-ADDQOL具有较好的信度和效度,值得推广应用。Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese normal audit of diabetes dependent quality of life (CN- ADDQOL) scale, and to popularize the disease-specific scale used in measuring the quality of life of patients with diabetes mellitus. Methods The reliability and validity of CN-ADDQOL on 697 diabetes was assessed by means of correlation analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Results Cronbach's otcoefficient of CN-ADDQOL was 0.914, which showed that CN-ADDQOL had better internal consistency. Most factor values 19 items for CN-ADDQOL exceeded 0.4, and all had statistical significance, which showed that CN- ADDQOL had better structural validity. Conclusion CN-ADDQOL had better reliability and validity, so it might be very valuable to further popularization in type 2 diabetes patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249