史官与史职——古史可信性的内证之路  

Official Historian and Career of Recording History——Inner Method of Evidence to the Credibility of Chinese Ancient History

作　　者：张京华[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南科技学院中文系,湖南永州425100

出　　处：《河南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2007年第4期5-11,共7页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学立项课题"舜文化与中华民族道德文明研究"(05JA720007)阶段成果;湖南省社会科学基金项目"现代疑古思潮与先秦诸子起源"(05ZC151)阶段成果

摘　　要：清代至民国学者关于上古史官史职的考察追述,大抵有"六经皆史"、"诸子出于王官"、"世官世畴"和"《春秋》义例"等几个命题。其中如刘师培、章太炎、柳诒徵、金毓黻等人的述论,主要是针对康有为的观点而提出批评,但对顾颉刚的疑古辨伪也同样适用,作为古史可信的内证方法之一,具有不可忽视的学术意义。About official historian and career of recording history in ancient China, scholars＇ studies which were from Qing Dynasty to the period of the Republic of China, probably had several propositions such as all of Confucian classics were historical books（“六经皆史”） ,and personal theory originated from offices which were established by Emperor（“诸子出于王官”）, and the office and career were inherited（“世官世畴”）, and what were the writing principle of Chun Qiu（“《春秋》义例”） ,etc. These scholars like Liu Shipei, Zhang Taiyan, Liu Yizheng and Jin Yufu, whose studies mainly criticized for the point of Kang Youwei, but which correspond with identifying ancient history of Gu Jiegang too. These academic meanings are not ignored when they are treated as one method of the inner evidence to the credibility of Chinese ancient history.

关 键 词：史官 史职 上古史 可信性 

分 类 号：K061[历史地理—历史学]