机构地区:[1]急性心肌梗死再灌注治疗研究协作组
出 处:《中华心血管病杂志》2007年第8期691-696,共6页Chinese Journal of Cardiology
基 金:国家"十五"攻关项目资助课题(2001BA703810)
摘 要:目的研究新型溶栓剂——重组葡激酶(r-Sak)治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)的冠状动脉通畅率、临床疗效及安全性。方法本研究为多中心、随机、平行对照临床试验,入选发病12 h 内、年龄≤70岁、ST 段抬高的 AMI 患者,随机分为 r-Sak 组104例,给予 r-Sak 3 mg 静注,12 mg 于30 min 内静脉输注,总量15 mg;重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)组106例,8 mg 静注,42 mg 在90 min 内输注,总量50 mg。全部患者给予阿司匹林和静脉输注肝素,于用药90 min 行冠状动脉造影,对 TIMI 血流0~2级者行补救性 PCI。结果主要终点:用药90 min 冠状动脉通畅率(TIMI 血流2级或3级),r-Sak 组明显高于 rt-PA 组(77.8%比63.6%,P=0.0277),TIMI 3级者两组间差异无统计学意义(57.6%比48.5%,P=0.1929);1个月内死亡(8.7%比5.7%,P=0.3997)、非致死性再梗死(2.9%比3.8%,P=1.0000)、心肌缺血复发(8.7%比16.0%,P=0.1043)和复合临床终点(18.3%比21.7%,P=0.5345)两组间差异均无统计学意义。次要终点:r-Sak 组出血发生率(28.8%)与 rt-PA组(27.4%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.8105),其中严重或威胁生命的出血,两组间差异亦无统计学意义(1.9%比3.8%),r-Sak 组脑出血1例(0.96%),rt-PA 组脑出血4例(3.85%)。无其他药物相关的严重不良反应及过敏反应发生。结论 r-Sak 是一种安全、有效的治疗 AMI 的溶栓药物,其疗效及安全性至少与 rt-PA 50 mg 相似。Objective The aim of the study was to compare the safety and clinical efficacy of recombinant staphylokinase (r-Sak) with recombinant tissue-type plasmlnogen activator (rt-PA) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods This multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel trial was conducted in 12 hospitals from January 2002 to October 2003. Patients ( age ~ 70 years ) with ST segment elevated AMI admitted within 12 hours of symptom onset were randomized to r-Sak (3 mg bolus followed by 12 mg intravenous infusion for 30 minutes, n = 104) or rt-PA (8 mg bolus followed by 42 mg intravenous infusion for 90 minutes, n = 106). All patients received aspirin and intravenous heparin and underwent angiography to determine infarct related artery ( IRA ) patency 90 minutes after drug therapy. Rescue percutenous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed for patients with TIMI grade≤ 2. Results The IRA patency ( TIMI grade 2 or 3 ), the primary end-point, was significantly higher in r-Sak group than that in rt-PA group (77. 8% vs. 63. 6%, P =0. 0277), the TIMI grade 3 flow was similar between the two groups (57.6% vs. 48.5% , P=0. 1929). One month pest therapy, rates of death (8.7% vs. 5.7% , P=0.3997), non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.9% vs. 3.8%, P = 1.0000), recurrent myocardial ischemia ( 8. 7% vs. 16.0% , P = 0. 1043 ) and composite clinical end-point ( 18. 3% vs. 21.7% , P = 0. 5345) were similar between the two groups. Hemorrhage occurred in 28. 8% of patients receiving r-Sak and 27.4% of patients receiving rt-PA (P =0. 8105) , severe and life-threatening hemorrhage rate ( 1.9% vs. 3. 8% ) as well as hemorrhagic stroke rate (0. 96% vs. 3.85% ) were also no significant difference between the two groups. No anaphylactic reaction and other severe adverse events related to drug therpy were noted. Conclusion of AMI.
分 类 号:R542.22[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...