检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国行为医学科学》2007年第2期111-112,共2页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
摘 要:目的调查和分析癌症患者应对策略的特点及其与社会支持的关系。方法采用医用应对问卷、社会支持评定量表等测查工具对205名癌症患者进行调查。结果(1)癌症患者应对策略可以聚类为两类:屈服应对型和灵活应对型。屈服应对患者在面对应对[(14.27±2.17)分VS(19.02±2.37)分,P〈0.01]和回避应对[(16.03±1.69)分VS(17.33±1.76)分,P〈0.01]上低于灵活应对型,在屈服应对[(10.11±1.72)分VS(9.23±1.93)分,P〈0.01]上高于灵活应对。(2)屈服应对型患者的主观社会支持[(12.50±2.36)分VS(13.77±2.32)分,P〈0.01]、客观社会支持[(9.64±1.37)分VS(10.32±1.82)分,P〈0.01]和支持总分[(30.48±3.63)分VS(32.73±4.06)分,P〈0.01]都显著低于灵活应对型患者。结论癌症患者可分为屈服应对型和灵活应对型两种应对类型,屈服应对型患者获得的社会支持少于灵活应对型患者。Objective To explore cancer patients' coping strategies features and relationships with social supports. Methods The medical coping strategy questionnaire and the social support questionnaire were adminis- trated to a sample of 205 cancer patients. Results There were two coping strategies types generalized by cluster analysis : subdued-coping and flexible-coping. The subjective and objective social supports of the subdued-coping were lower than that of the flexible-coping. Conclusion There were two coping strategies types of the cancer pa- tients: subdued-coping and flexible-coping and the subdued-coping had less social supports.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117